YOUR FIRST SOURCE FOR ARCHITECTURE IN CHICAGO ONLINE

Google


www chicagoarchitecturetoday.com

 

Contests & Competitions


 

In the 125 years since William Le Baron Jenney’s 10-story Home Insurance Building in Chicago became the world’s first skyscraper, the spectacle of soaring towers has become increasingly common wherever land is scarce, allowing cities to stack life ever taller, denser and more dynamic. Like cathedrals and palaces of the past, skyscrapers today define their cities’ identities as they shape the skyline. As the late critic Herbert Muschamp wrote of these modern wonders, “Contemporary architects reveal the inner world in the process of adorning the outer one.”

Art Knowledge News

 

MOCK FIRMS

CHICAGO 2010

COLLEGIATE 

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

COMPETITION

 

 

THE CHALLENGE GOES OUT!

What would it take to gather together the most talented skilled labor force from among your friends and classmates to produce a nationally-recognized project? If this is the sort of challenge which intrigues and motivates you, you are just that's the kind of visionary we're seeking to compete in the 2010 Mock Architecture Firm Competition! If you believe you have what it takes to put together a team of success-minded drafters, graphic artists, engineers, and communicators to incorporate your own simulated architecture firm then make plans now to be in Chicago, April 15-17 for the 2010 Mock Firms Finals. We hope to see you there!

 

WHAT IS THE MOCK FIRM COMPETITION?

The Mock Architecture Firm Competition is the next step in student-design competition. It is an exciting & innovative opportunity for students interested in the design/build industry to test their skills in a uniquely collaborative environment, compete on a national level and have their work evaluated by top industry professionals. 

WHAT IS THE FOCUS OF THIS YEAR’S CONTEST?

This year’s theme is “Global Challenges: Architectural Solutions.” As we continue to make adjustments for the long journey into the 21st Century, we recognize the need and the privilege to utilize our talents and ideas to improve  living conditions for our communities and beyond.. This year's International Skyscraper Challenge endeavors to achieve innovative dwelling solutions through the design of vertical communities.

  • Top American Mock Firm

  • Top International Mock Firm

  • Top Mock Firm Organization

  • Top Building Design

  • Top Marketing Presentation

  • Top Entry Presentation

Or email us at info@mockfirms.org for more information

Or by phone at 773.410.1314 (7am - 7pm CST)

Or by fax at 773.304.2929   

 

  

Cloud Gate a.k.a. "The Bean" in Chicago's Millennium Park

 

QUALIFYING FIRMS FOR THE 2010 MOCK FIRMS FINAL PRESENTATION

INTERNATIONAL SKYSCRAPER CHALLENGE

Collegiate Division

California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo, CA [Metous Studio]

Carleton University – Ottawa, Ontario [A2 Group]

Kungliga Technical Hogskolan – Limerick, Sao Paulo, Stockholm, Valencia, Zurich [Panarch]

Long Beach Community College – Long Beach, CA [LBCC Design Team]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [Luis Sacristan Inc]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [MASCH Architects]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [All Night Long, Inc]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [Dobladillo Architects]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [Misch Architecture]

Lund School of Architecture – Lund, Sweden [Catarina Pacheco de Freitas Machad]

Ohio State University – Columbus, OH [U3G]

University of Colorado – Boulder, CO [JDDM + Associates]

University of Colorado – Boulder, CO [Verve Design Studio]

Western Kentucky University – Bowling Green, KY [Chantico]

__________________________________________

NATIONAL SKYSCRAPER CHALLENGE

High School Division

Appleton East High School – Appleton, WI [Synergy Associates]

Benton High School – Benton, AR [Groken Architekten]

Bradley Technology & Trade High School – Milwaukee, WI [GRP Partners]

Carbondale Community High School – Carbondale, IL [Aura Architects & Associates]

Carbondale Community High School – Carbondale, IL [HOB & Associates]

Cate High School – Carpentaria, CA [Frank Song + Partners]

Kalamazoo Central High School – Kalamazoo, MI [Gage + Associates]

Lemont High School – Lemont, IL [MZK Nation]

Loyola Academy – Wilmette, IL [Hex Tech]

Loyola Academy – Wilmette, IL [S.T.A.R]

Loyola Academy – Wilmette, IL [Cutting Edge Architecture]

North Mecklenburg High School – Huntersville, NC [LTW Architecture]

North Mecklenburg High School – Huntersville, NC [JAMT Architecture]

North Mecklenburg High School – Huntersville, NC [Queen City Architecture]

North Mecklenburg High School – Huntersville, NC [Skyline Architecture]

Olathe East High School – Olathe, KS [Labyrinth Designs]

Olathe East High School – Olathe, KS [High Rising Architects]

White Knoll High School – Lexington, SC [Dynamic National Architecture]

___________________________________________

REGIONAL HOME DESIGN COMPETITION

Cate High School – Carpentaria, CA [Frank Song + Partners]

Hinsdale South High School – Darien, IL [Hornet Associates]

Pearlsburg High School – Pearlsburg, VA [ACE Architects]

Wheaton North High School – Wheaton, IL [Falcon Architecture]

 

WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT DEADLINE DATES?

Saturday, March 27, 2010 | Video Projects Due for Attending Firms

Friday, April 2, 2010 - Final Projects Due for Non-Attending Firms

Friday, April 16, 2010Mock Firm Presentations

 


 

GLOBAL CHALLENGES: ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS

The Mexico City 2010 Initiative

With the ongoing shrinkage of available and suitable space to meet the residential needs of burgeoning urban populations, designers and developers are looking at the use of vertical communities to achieve housing goals. The 2010 International Skyscraper Challenge affords today's future designers an opportunity to assume the profile of professionals as they incorporate a team of skilled partners to design, construct and market a tall building for a site within the dense urban population of Mexico City – the 3rd largest metropolitan region in the world.

 

WHAT ARE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE BUILDING?

Current Stats & Facts:

ü       Located in a valley region on a former riverbed with frequent seismic activity

ü       Mexico City is the economic and cultural center of the country of Mexico

ü       Its population is approaching 8.5 million people

ü       Greater Mexico City has a population exceeding 19 million – making it currently the 3rd largest such region in the world.

ü       Air quality is poor and the city suffers from a lack of fresh water supply

ü       Its income per capita is $25, 258 competitive among global capitals

ü       The metro is one of the busiest in the world transporting approximately 4.5 million people every day in addition to an international airport and extensive bus system

ü       Founded on Aztec and 16th Century Spanish influences

ü       Roman Catholicism is the predominate practice of faith

ü       The tallest building is Torre Mayor – an office building that is 225 meters (740 feet or 55 stories). It is also the tallest building in Latin America and was designed by the architecture firm, Zeidler Partnership Architects.

 

Commission Objective:

To bring together a design team from among your peers to conceive, design, construct and market what is to be the largest residential building in Mexico City which advantages public transportation, sustainable solutions, and cultural considerations.

Design Parameters:

  • Residential program

  • Comprehensive utilization & maximization of site

  • Street-level entries, lobby and lower floors can facilitate commercial programs

  • Height restrictions: between 50 – 75 stories, 650’ – 800’

  • Residential units should accommodate a family of 5 minimum 

  • Post modern form

  • Must be constructed to withstand an 8.5 earthquake

  • Plans to achieve zero-energy usage over a period of time

  • Environmentally-conscious building design

  • Climate-conscious

  • Culturally-conscious in the area of materials, amenities, agrarian practices and the local economy 

  • Integration of public transportation

  • Interaction or relationship with community fabric

Site Context:

We have researched areas with the central district of Mexico City for sites appropriate to the design project stated here. Please choose one of the three selections provided and be prepared to justify your selection in written and oral presentations.  

SITE SELECTION #1

SITE SELECTION #2

SITE SELECTION #3

SITE SELECTION #4

Specification Note: While we are providing several general locations, we are not requiring an exact location or orientation on these sites for your building as to allow for variations in problem solving interpretations and approaches. We are however specifying a maximum allowable building footprint of 55,000 sq ft.


CONTEST DETAILS

WHAT ARE THE MAIN OBJECTIVES FOR THE COMPETITION?

To assemble a team of designers with diverse talents and abilities to create, contract, construct and have fun commercially marketing a residential high-rise or super-tall skyscraper as a pretend-professional firm.

ARE THERE ANY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE FIRM?

Firms must be no less then two (2), but no more than four (4). The main members of the firms shall be called partners and/or principals. Job titles can be assigned to each partner, but is not a requirement. Although partners should attend the same school, they do not have to be the same grade level nor in the same class or section in that school. 

HOW DO WE PUT TOGETHER OUR DESIGN TEAM UPON WINNING?

The idea of the competition is to achieve a basic simulation of an architectural firm which is preparing to pitch its design ideas to a prospective client. You have begun this process by choosing your main partners already. Now, it will be necessary to assign specific tasks to each partner according to their abilities. Additionally, each and any task which can be best performed by someone other than your partners can be assigned to classmates as staff in your company or as independent sub-contractors. This group of employees or contractors can number any amount in total. The only restriction is that they be students. Your instructor can serve as a consultant to the firm or project. 

WHAT SPECIFIC PROJECT AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPETE AT NATIONALS?

The List of required projects is as follows:

·         A Company Logo

·         A Business Card

·         An organizational flow chart showing the hierarchy of mock employees and their job titles

·         A single page description of the focus and/or scope of your firm

·         A video presentation introducing the structure of your firm (and project if you so choose)

·         Poster presentations showing color perspectives of various views of your building 

·         A series of CAD drawings consisting of the primary elevation, a site plan, a residential or office floorplan, and a 3-D perspective view.

·         A scaled model of the building and its surrounding environs.

·         An oral presentation selling the design of building which should include descriptions of materials used, architectural styling, amenities, features, innovations, sustainability and LEED design goals, creative financing, and community benefits.

WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC PARAMETERS OF THE REQUIRED PROJECTS

A company logo can range from the style, font and position of your firm's name to an existing or original symbol or graphic.

Business cards should contain the firm's name, logo, name and title of holder, city, state, (country if applicable), email and phone number.

The organizational chart should list founding partners and "principals" at the top with the next tier being you would designate as firm members. Below this level would be any contracted students from another class or school along with adult consultants.

A summary of your company can encompass anywhere from a paragraph to a page of typed information describing your firm, its programs, purpose, its strengths, and technologies. Report should be 1.5 or double-spaced. The title should be the name of your firm.

The video is to be between 2-4 minutes in duration and uploaded to YouTube. The content should primarily be a description of your firm's organization and all the different roles involved. It can additionally be comprised of a walk through of your design process from start to finish, an overview about your building, or a combination of any or all the afore-mentioned. The video should include Mock Architectural Firm Competition in the opening or closing credits.

 

Poster presentations should be on a 18" x 24" foamboard or close approximation thereof. You can have up to 3 posters. Posters should be color-illustrated showing interior and exterior perspectives of your building and its environs. Text descriptions or captions can be included, if so desired. No border is preferable.

CAD drawings of your skyscraper project should number (4) four in total consisting of an elevation, site plan, floor plan, and perspective. Drawing size should be presented on "C" (17" x 22") or "D-sized" 24" x 36" paper or near to that size but not to exceed it. Title in Title block should read Mock Architectural Firms. Your building name should be the title of the drawing. Include firm's name, school name, date, drawing scale, and section codes, i.e. A-1, A-2, etc. Dimensions can be included on the plan and/or elevation views.  

Model Presentations should display not only your building and its site, but as much of the surrounding environs as possible including non-descript buildings and structures. Landscaping is encouraged. Your building's scale should allow the entirety of your project to sit on a tabletop surface of a size average 3' x 2.5.' The building can be made of any materials you deem appropriate including plexi-glass, wood, cardboard, foamboard, etc.

Oral Presentations of your building project should inform judges of the virtues of your design. This would include justifications for the construction of this project, descriptions of the design style and materials used, architectural compatibility in the community, amenities, features, innovations, sustainability and LEED design goals, creative financing, and community benefits. The length of your presentation should fall between 5 to 10 minutes. Visual aids and media can be used to support your presentation, but should not consume nor supplant your verbal report.

Re-designs of your building is not only allowable but anticipated. In real world situations, original concepts and design submissions are often subject to a “re-do” because of various constraints. These may be financial, community or civic-oriented, and client-directed. Nevertheless, your final construct should be a radical departure from the original. Please retain these design changes and present them along with the final project at the national event.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR NON-ATTENDING MOCK FIRMS

While it is regretful on our part that we will not be able to interact with you in person, we understand any issues which would prevent your attendance. We don't want you to be at any disadvantage for your presentation and will do our best to insure a fair representation of all "firms" not present in Chicago.

The following are several presentation specifics to be noted in lieu of being able to present in person in Chicago

1. Only one video submission is necessary. This video can be 5-10 minute in duration with our advice to keep it on the lower side of the range as it can be difficult to ensure attentiveness with lengthy presentations. So this video replaces any and all others. Its purpose is to put a face (human element) to your firm for the judges. This video should be more comprehensive introducing not only your firm and its organizational structure, but adding spoken elements to your building project as to your thinking, philosophy, and other nuances which might be difficult to capture from print & models. Finally it should be uploaded on YouTube and sent to us on DVD (please test it to make sure it works!). The video should reach us before or by April 2nd to give us opportunity to review and determine a set-up procedure.

2. Non-presenting firms which are not sending their model through to us can submit a set of 6 photos not to exceed 8 x 10 or can submit 3 additional 18" x 24" presentation posters (totaling 6 overall) showcasing the building model.

3. The reason we limit the amount of CAD drawings is to minimize the timeframe needed to assess entry by the judges. But in deference to additional programmatic elements indicated, we will allow one (1) plan per differing element to be submitted. Also, a section can be submitted in lieu of the CAD perspective.

4. Every project received will be set-up with care as it also reflects on us if its not done properly and pleasingly. Please make sure to secure attachments and other such constructed elements and to provide a means for reattachment if separation occurs while shipping. We cannot buy glue and other such materials if needed in every case. If your display presentation requires an ordered set-up, please provide instructions (possibly with a photo) as to desired arrangement. Finally, presentations posters have been mailed to us before so that is a possible and preferable option., but if that is not feasible, you can mail them via tube with the CAD material.

 


Home | Scholarships | Contests | Message Board | Archtionary | AEC Directory | Area Colleges & Universities

Building Directory | Tourist Sites | Arch-Tunes | Hometown Heroes | Sightlines | Featured Friends | Merchandise | Classifieds | Archives | Articles

About Us | Contact Us | Career Opportunities | Play Sudoku | Make Us Your Homepage

© Copyright 2006, Chicago Architecture Today LLC. All rights reserved.